indi; divide; dualist… what a word. what a language. properly, in-divid-u-al; indivisible – a Latin creation, from individualis/individu. i see it as a play on ideas within itself; the singular practising the dichotomy; one encompassing two. we exist in a reality based on contrast, and we can easily be distracted or addicted to the ideas of “this or that” instead of the truth of “this and that”, for one construct cannot exist or even be conceived of without the potential emergence of the other – even if it manifests only in the imagination…

so, what is indivisible? science is now dancing with the idea that our universe is the result of one, single, photon. our brains can’t compute that; our presence is so scattered and fragmented that these concepts simply cannot equate. there are bills to pay, love to find, belonging to discover, banks to bail out… a bit of a cosmic joke, possibly. but a little curiosity about how that rock, or cat, or planet, or galaxy is put together can really stun the synapses, and catch the breath.

what really matters? what is matter, really? what is genuinely worth our focus, fretting over, and concern? what is love? why do i love? who am i? why am i?

who is asking the question?

existentialist humour, perhaps, but i doubt if the universe takes itself so seriously. all-of-life is beyond trivialities such as words and definitions and control mechanisms. i think we could benefit from letting go of the need to control more often: how can life be anything but supportive to all aspects of you? all desires, all dimensions, all realities and storylines; all the variables that amount to who you are right here, right now…

life, is for you. life is by and made of you. life is a coalescent juice that love abides, freely. we are that infinity, the lightness, and all the space between.

remember your divinity, now and then…

solvitur ambulando