In a world where truth has been kneecapped by institutional sleight of hand and narratives mutate faster than anyone can track, we’re left to parse meaning from fragmented signals in the noise. We witness the skies and the systems and ask: is what I’m seeing real — or curated? In this exchange, the veil is not lifted cleanly, but pulled at from both sides.
Tag: climate change
In a world that often feels drenched in fear and scarcity, where the headlines are fueled by perpetual crises and the airwaves are thick with narratives of doom, it’s easy to lose sight of a deeper truth. The systems that shape our realities — media, politics, and even our environmental discourse — are often built on the very narratives that sustain our collective anxiety. This discussion uncovers how these dynamics function, examining both their psychological impact and their societal effects. Ultimately, it calls for a deeper self-awareness and an inner reorientation toward autonomy, resilience, and truth.
As you may be aware, I am not a supporter of climate change alarmism, nor do I believe there is a climate emergency. In my mind, it is one grand hoax. These are not the end times for our world; we’re not anywhere near the “11th hour,” the ice isn’t melting, the oceans aren’t rising or boiling, polar bears aren’t dying off, the coral reef isn’t disappearing, and, no, not everything is going up in smoke (and as a reminder, climate arson is not wildfire). That said, I care deeply about this wonderful and remarkable place we currently inhabit, and I care deeply about my fellow humans, and I absolutely agree that we can do far better regarding our stewardship of this realm and the ways and means we go about its resource management.
There is no global climate emergency. It’s a well-known, widely accepted reality, unless you’re a popular pandering expert, an ingroup shill celebrity, or drinking a lot of panic kool-aid.
Just as far too many health-related concerns have since mid-2020 been aggressively corralled and crammed haphazardly into the soon-to-be-infamous “covid containment” ideology, so, too, are disparate and conflicting ecological and environmental concerns being relayed to “climate change” (or, green ideology). In both camps, alarmists and experts alike have been saying “the science is settled,” which, of course, it most certainly is not.