This exploration isn’t a call to action in the traditional sense — it’s more of a lens adjustment. A sharpening of perception. If you’ve ever sensed that the myths we’re fed — from books to blockbusters — carry a deeper programming than what appears on the surface, this dialogue is for you. It doesn’t aim to dismantle the system with pitchforks and protests, but to render it visible — inert — through inquiry, subtlety, and sovereignty of thought.
Tag: dissent
Most are now aware of Argentina’s new “rock star” president, Javier Milei. Recently, I watched his interview on the Lex Fridman podcast and delved deeper into his story, grand aspirations, and the much-needed injection of his heartfelt dissent into the ideologically saturated forums of the United Nations (UN) and the World Economic Forum (WEF).
It’s August 2024. This is a watershed moment in Canadian history, and for Western nations in general. For example, consider Bill C-63. It is introduced, in part, under the guise of an amorphous, ambiguous concept such as “online harm,” but, in practice, it will result in increased censorship, social unrest, and further instills and legitimizes communist sociopolitics in the future. When a law is intentionally left unclear, ill-defined, and open to interpretation based on the politics of those involved, it’s a dangerous, slippery slope that will put the “Digital Safety Office,” their enforcers in the police services, and the unwitting judiciary in hot water.
A society will eventually destabilize and collapse as a result of this overly simplistic and yet predictable agenda in which anyone can be fined, arrested, tried, or imprisoned for simply speaking up and sharing their opinion, whether online or not. Heaven forbid you ever criticize or insult our era’s foolish, narcissistic, corrupt, captured, and cowardly politicians.