For thousands of years, humanity has sought to understand its place in the cosmos, attempting to define the intangible aspects of existence — what animates us, what transcends us, and what ultimately connects us to something greater. Among these explorations, the distinction between soul and spirit has been one of the most enduring, yet remains deeply misunderstood.
. . .
In many spiritual traditions, the soul is seen as the individual — the experiencer bound to time, memory, and the lessons of life as learned through the human experience on Earth. But spirit is something altogether grander. It is the eternal, unchanging essence, the breath of God, the ever-present witness behind all things.
If the soul is the thread that weaves through lifetimes, then spirit is the loom upon which the universe itself is woven. To fully understand spirit, it helps to examine how ancient cultures and wisdom traditions perceived it, how it has been confused or conflated with the soul, and why recognizing its role is essential to deepening our understanding of existence.
The concept of spirit is nearly universal across cultures, often linked with breath, wind, or air — symbols of something invisible yet essential, something that moves through all things without being bound by them.
In Sanskrit, the word Atman refers to the eternal self, often translated as “soul” in English, though a more accurate interpretation aligns it with spirit. Atman is not personal or individual but the infinite aspect of being — beyond change, beyond karma, beyond incarnation. The Upanishads describe it:
“The Atman, smaller than a grain of rice, yet larger than the heavens, resides within all. It is not born, nor does it die. It is beyond all decay and destruction.”
This eternal nature of spirit is mirrored in the Taoist concept of Qi, though Qi is often seen as an energetic force rather than the ultimate divine essence. Yet, in Taoist teachings, beyond Qi there is Tao — the Way, the Source of all things. If Qi flows through us like the soul, then Tao is the spirit — the undivided whole, the nameless mystery that is both nowhere and everywhere. Lao Tzu describes it in the Tao Te Ching:
“The Tao that can be named is not the eternal Tao. The nameless is the beginning of heaven and earth. The named is the mother of ten thousand things.”
Similarly, in the Abrahamic traditions, spirit has been linked with breath and divine presence. The Hebrew word Ruach means both “spirit” and “wind,” signifying the unseen force that sustains life. In Genesis, it is written:
“And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.”
This echoes the Hindu belief that the universe was brought into being by divine breath, or Prana, which pervades all living things but is not limited to them. Spirit, then, is not something inside us — it is the very ground of existence, within which the soul moves. But what is the nature of this “divine breath”? That would be Source, or God — the Creator, the All That Is; the consciousness unbound, the before, the after, and everything in between. It is that which mere words cannot adequately convey or encapsulate.
Over time, the distinction between soul and spirit has been blurred, particularly in Western traditions, where the soul has taken on multiple roles — as both the essence of personal identity and the immortal aspect of being. While not entirely inaccurate, this fusion has led to contradictions and misunderstandings in spiritual teachings.
Plato and later Christian theologians described the soul as immortal yet bound to individual experiences, making it unclear whether it was truly eternal or still subject to growth and change. Rudolf Steiner attempted to clarify this, stating:
“The spirit is eternal, untouched by birth and death. The soul, however, is the bridge between the temporal and the eternal—it takes impressions, learns, and transforms through experience, but the spirit remains whole, complete, unchanging.”
This differentiation is fundamental. If the soul is the vessel that carries our experiences, spirit is the ocean that holds all vessels. The soul moves, the spirit is. The soul learns, the spirit knows.
Walter Russell further expands on this distinction:
“Man mistakenly seeks to become what he already is. The spirit is whole, yet man sees himself as incomplete. He dreams of ascending to that which he has never left.”
This “dream of separation” is the very reason the soul exists — to experience, to learn, to grow. But the spirit is never on a journey because it has never been anywhere else. It is the river upon which the dream may be carried.
Many ancient traditions describe spirit not as an external force but as something holographic — where each part contains the whole. This is perhaps best expressed in the Hindu concept of Brahman, the universal consciousness of which Atman (spirit) is a perfect reflection. The Chandogya Upanishad states:
“Thou art That.” (Tat Tvam Asi)
This simple phrase encapsulates a profound truth: the spirit within us is not separate from the divine — it is the divine. Just as a drop of water is not separate from the ocean, the spirit is not separate from Source.
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin echoed this sentiment:
“We are not simply a spark of the divine. We are the divine experiencing itself through the veil of form. The further we look outward, the more we find we are looking inward. The universe is not a collection of separate beings, but a single being unfolding into awareness of itself.”
This idea aligns with modern holographic theories of consciousness, suggesting that rather than being discrete entities, our souls are fractal expressions of a single unified whole.
If spirit is eternal and unchanging, beyond experience and identity, how can we recognize it in our lives?
The answer is presence.
Spirit is not something we acquire; it is something we uncover by being fully present in the moment, by attaining awareness through renewed communion with the soul. When thought ceases, when desires momentarily fade, when we are simply aware — that is when spirit is most apparent.
Rumi describes this recognition beautifully:
“Close your eyes. Fall in love. Stay there.”
To “fall in love” in this sense is not with a person, but with existence itself. When we let go of the illusion of separateness, we return to what we have always been — spirit, eternal and indivisible.
Understanding spirit is not an intellectual exercise — it is an experience of recognition. It is seeing through the illusory, multifaceted story that convinced us we are separate drops in the ocean and realizing, knowing, remembering that we are the ocean itself.
While the soul moves through incarnations, gathering experiences, spirit remains unchanged — always present, always whole. The soul is the rhythm of breath; spirit is the air itself.
Walter Russell sums up this journey of realization:
“Man seeks to find that which he has never lost. He dreams of heaven, but heaven is within him. Spirit is not reached—it is remembered.”
The ultimate truth is not something to be sought. It is something we already are.
Temet Nosce
Continue to Part V: Union. Or, read Part I: Intro, Part II: Soul, Part III: Soul vs. Spirit.